by Thierry Watin
>>
7-8-2010 14:28:15 | |
First session of my life at PLN
Very impressive spot, flat, long ....
For a first session on this spot, I'm very pleased to break my personal record !!
I think, I could have broken the 40knts but I would have needed to take more risk, but I like to keep safe :)
Special thanks for the local people, very friendly !!
| |
by Nico Nouwen
>>
7-8-2010 14:48:49 | |
Thierry, a very nice score at PLN.!!!
However, I think that you have a second look at your track because you present some strange results. For instance your 250 m is faster than your 100 m and you're 500 meter is only 0.25 knots slower than your 10 seconds.
| |
by Thierry Watin
>>
8-8-2010 16:35:01 | |
Thanks Nico,
I've just noted your comment, this website has so much evolved since my last use (in the good way !!).
You're right, I 've noticed that too, even if I have already cleared out the track ....is it possible that it's due to the "One best per run" option ?
I've sent the track to the admin to validate the Mile, so I hope they can help me in cleaning and finding out the trouble: I will correct this session after.
I must also admit I'm not an expert in analysing the track ...
| |
by Nico Nouwen
>>
9-8-2010 08:25:37 | |
The option "one best per run" is there so that the program in the output
file gives a listing of 5 fastest 10 seconds/100 m's etc that are made
in different runs. The fastest 100, 250, 500m and mile, however, can be
part of the same run.
You can check if the settings of your GPS are right and if it stores
enough datapoints/timeframe because it seems that the calculated 2
seconds by the program is faster than the one given on the GPS.
| |